PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
R.S.Mongia, J.
Sanatan Dharam Sabha (Regd) Ambala Cantt.Through Its President
Versus
Haryana State, Through Secretary To Government, Department Of Power
Civil Writ Petition No. 1012 of 1989,
Decided On : DECEMBER 17, 1991
ELECTRICITY CHARGES - DOMESTIC VS NON-DOMESTIC - REGISTRATION OF SOCIETIES ACT, 1860 - SCHEDULE OF TARIFF - INTERPRETATION - CHARGING OF ELECTRICITY CHARGES TO RELIGIOUS, EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS - DISTINCTION BETWEEN DOMESTIC AND NON-DOMESTIC SUPPLY - APPLICABILITY OF DOMESTIC SUPPLY CHARGES TO DHARMSHALA AND NON-DOMESTIC SUPPLY CHARGES TO SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS AND TEMPLE.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, a registered society running religious, educational and charitable institutions, challenged the Respondent-Haryana State Electricity Board's (Board) practice of charging commercial rates for electricity to these institutions, arguing that they should be charged domestic rates.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the dominant purpose of the user of the building determines whether domestic or non-domestic supply charges are to be levied. Dharmshala, being used for residential purposes, is liable to domestic supply charges, while schools, hospitals, and temples, not being used for residential purposes, are liable to non-domestic supply charges.
Issues: 1. Whether the Board is justified in charging commercial rates for electricity to the petitioner's institutions, which are religious, educational, and charitable in nature? 2. Whether the petitioner's institutions are entitled to domestic supply charges or non-domestic supply charges?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted the Schedule of Tariff issued by the Board, which categorizes institutions into domestic and non-domestic based on the dominant purpose of the user of the building. 2. The court held that the dominant purpose of the user of the building determines whether domestic or non-domestic supply charges are to be levied. 3. The court distinguished between residential and non-residential activities, holding that Dharmshala is used for residential purposes and is therefore liable to domestic supply charges, while schools, hospitals, and temples are not used for residential purposes and are therefore liable to non-domestic supply charges.
Final Decision: The court partially allowed the petition, directing the Board to charge domestic supply charges only to the petitioner's Dharmshala and non-domestic supply charges to the other institutions.
R.S.Mongia, J.
1. Petitioner Sanatan Dharm Sabha (Registered) Ambala Cantt., is a Society registered under the Registration of Societies Act, 1860. According to the averments, the Society is a religious and charitable institution, and its main aim and object is to propogate the Sanatan Dharm by all legitimate means To achieve this aim and object of the Society, it has established 4 High Schools for Boys and Girls, a Public School a Blind Institute and an Industrial School for Women where embroidery, knitting and tailoring are taught. It has also established a Natural Cure Hospital with Phsiotherahy Department and an Eye. Hospital two Dharmshalas. and a Temple (Mandir) at Ambala Cantt. The said Institutions have been granted electricity connections by Respondent-Haryana State Electricity Board (hereinafter called the Board).
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the-Respondent-Board is charging electricity charges for the above said Institutions on the commercial rates by treating the Institutions as commercial Establishments inspite of the fact that none of the Establishments of the petitioner is carrying any commercial activities and are rather purety religious, educational and charitable Institutions. According to the petitioner, the Respondent should levy charges, for domestic supply from all the Institutions of the petitioner. The Schedule of tariff issued by the Respondent-Board lays down as to which category of institutions, the rates domestic supply would be applicable and to which rates of non-domestic supply would be applicable The same reads as under :-
DOMESTIC SUPPLY (i) Availability : Available to single private house flat or hostel of educational institutions (including mess/canteen) working womens hostel run by State Govt. Red Cross Society/Welfare Societies, Anganwadi, workers training Centres for lights fans domestic pumping sets and household appliances, Private dwelling in which space is occasianally used for the conduct of business by a person residing therein shall also be covered under tins tariff where a portion of the dwelling is used regularly for the conduct of a business, the consumption in that portion will be separately metered and billed under the appropriate Non-Domestic or Industrial power, tariff. If separate circuits are not provided the entire supply will be classified under "Non-Domestic Supply?
Release and sub-metering to tenants other flats or house-holds and other parties is strictly prohibited except with the permission of supplier in which case the blocks of tariff shall not be compounder. A hostel shall be considered as one unit and billed with out compounding. The supply for residential quarters/flats attached to the educational institutions for staff members shall not be compounded."
NON-DOMESTIC SUPPLY (i) Availability : Availability for lights, fans, appliances and small motors to all non-residential premises such as business houses cinemas, clubs, public offices, schools, hospitals hotels etc (except Village Chaupals. Re-sale and sub metering to tenants adjoining houses and to other parties is strictly prohibited except with the permission of supplier, in which cases, blocks of tariff shall not be compounded?
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner argued that in the institutions ran by the petitioner-Society, no trade or commerce is carried out and all these Institutions are religious and providing educational and other services to humanity without any distinction of caste or creed. There is no profit motive of the Society. The whole expenditure is borne out of the donations received by the Society. To support his contention, learned counsel cited a judgment of the Kerla High Court reported as Social S. G. of Assist Sisters v. K.S.E.B. 1988 (1) K. L. T 727. that as far as Temple is concerned it cannot be said that it is a commercial consumer as the activities which go on in a temple cannot in any way be said to be commercial.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.