SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(P&H) 1050

G.R.MAJITHIA
Sheo Dayal – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash – Respondent


Judgment

G.R.Majithia, J.

1. This judgment disposes of Regular Second Appeals No. 40 and 41 of 1979. These are directed against the judgment and decree of the first appellate Court which, on appeal, reversed those of the trial Judge and decreed the suit of Om Parkash alias Dhaulia, plaintiff/respondent No. 1, for specific performance of agreement to lease dated January 10, 1974.

2. Facts first :-

Om Parkash alias Dhaulia, plaintiff-respondent No. 1, sought specific performance of agreement to lease dated January 10, 1974 regarding the suit land against Umrao Singh and Mittar Sen, defendant-respondents No. 2 and 3 in R. S. A. No. 40 of 1979 and appellants in R. S. A. No. 41 of 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the lessors). Sheo Dayal and Chiranji were arrayed as defendants Nos. 4 and 5 by the plaintiff since they claimed that they were in possession of the disputed land under a prior lease deed dated June 1, 1972. They are appellants in R. S. A. No. 40 of 1979, but will be referred to as the second lessees in the body of this judgment. As alleged in the plaint the lessors were to lease out the disputed land to the plaintiff for 99 years on payment of yearly rent of Rs. 180/-. The lea




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top