PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
S.S.Sodhi and G.C.Garg JJ.
Hindu Higher Secondary School, Kaithal
Versus
State Of Haryana
Amended Letters Patent Appeal No. 1287 of 1990,
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 30, 1991
HARYANA AIDED SCHOOLS (SECURITY OF SERVICE) ACT, 1971 - SECTION 8 - Termination of services of a teacher during probation - Legality - Court held that termination of services of a teacher during probation on the ground that his services were no longer required not that his work and conduct was not satisfactory is illegal.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent, a teacher at the Hindu Higher Secondary School, Kaithal, was appointed on probation for a period of two years. Before the expiry of this period, his services were terminated on the ground that they were no longer required due to a decrease in the number of students.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the termination of the respondent's services was illegal as it was not based on his work and conduct but on the decrease in the number of students, which was not a valid reason for termination under the Haryana Aided Schools (Security of Service) Act, 1971 and the rules framed thereunder.
Issues: Whether the termination of the respondent's services was legal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the termination of the respondent's services was illegal as it was not based on his work and conduct but on the decrease in the number of students, which was not a valid reason for termination under the Haryana Aided Schools (Security of Service) Act, 1971 and the rules framed thereunder.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal filed by the school and directed the school management to pay the respondent all his arrears of pay and allowances.
S.S.Sodhi, J.
1. The matter here concerns the termination of the services of a teacher at the Hindu Higher Secondary School, Kaithal, during his period of probation on the ground that his services were no longer required not that his work and conduct was not satisfactory. The provisions of the Haryana Aided Schools (Security of Service) Act, 1971 and the rule framed thereunder admittedly being applicable.
2. On December 10, 1979, after being duly selected by the Selection Committee, the respondent-Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, was appointed Social Studies Master. According to the terms of his appointment, he was to be on probation for a period of two years. Before the expiry of this period, however, his services were terminated by the order of May 2, 1981 (annexure P/3) on the ground that they were no longer required. This order was passed in pursuance of the resolution of the Managing Committee of the School of April 30, 1981 (Annexure P/2) which reads as under:-
"As the number of students of the school is decreasing, it is unanimously resolved that Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, the Junior-most S.S. Master be given one months notice and be relieved accordingly....."
3. Shri Ram Kumar Sharma-respondent, represented against the termination of his service to the District Education Officer, but no relief was granted to him. He thereupon, went up in appeal before the Director of School Education, Haryana under the Haryana Aided School (Security of Service) Act, 1971 and the rules framed thereunder.
4. During the hearing of the appeal on being so directed, both Shri Ram Kumar Sharma and the Manager of the School appeared before the appellate authority, in person. It is significant to note that on being asked to explain the circumstances under which the services of Shri Ram Kumar Sharma had been terminated, instead of giving any reason in support of the action taken, the Manager of the school sought to rest content with the stand that under rule-8 of the Haryana Aided Schools (Security of Service) Rules, 1971, the Management was fully competent to dispense with the service of the respondent as he was still working on probation. The order of terminating the services of Shri Ram Kumar Sharma was consequently quashed and the Management was directed to reinstate him in service forthwith. Full pay and allowances for the period that he remained out of service were also ordered to be paid to him. It is this order of the Director of School Education, Haryana, that was sought to be challenged in proceedings under Article 226.of the Constitution of India.
5. In appeal here, it was the categoric stand of Mr. A.CJain, counsel for the School that the services of Shri Ram Kumar Sharma had been terminated not because his work and conduct was not satisfactory, but on account of the short-fall in the number of students rendering imperative reduction in the strength of teachers. Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, it was asserted, in this behalf, was the junior-most amongst the teachers. Neither of these pleas can, however, stand scrutiny.
6. It is no doubt correct that decrease in the number of students was mentioned in the resolution of the school Management (annexure P-2) as the reason for terminating the services of Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, but a reference to the affidavit of Shri M.L.Gupta, Principal qf the School of July 17, 1991 would show that the strength of the students in April, 1979 was 1494, which went up to 1507 in April 1980 after being as high as 1753 in September, 1979. During the same period, next year, that is September, 1989, it went even higher to 1896, coming down, however in March 1981 to 1751 and to 1186 in April 1981. The number, however, again arose to 1525 in May 1981 and then to 1833 in July that year. These figures have their own tale to tell. What is pertinent to note here is that despite the specific direction of this Court, by the order of May 30, 1991, no information was furnished by the School regarding the Sections in various classes du
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.