SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(P&H) 512

S.S.SODHI, N.K.KAPOOR
M. M. Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Gift-tax Officer – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Sodhi, J.

1. The challenge in this bunch of writ petitions is to the notice issued by the Gift-tax Officer to the petitioners on March 18, 1985, under section 16(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.

2. The matter here pertains to the assessment year 1977-78. All the petitioners were partners of the firm, Messrs. Mahajan International. On December 31, 1986, in pursuance of an agreement for sale entered into between the parties, Mahajan International sold the running business of this firm with all its assets and liabilities to Panipat Foods Limited for a sum of Rs. 20,21,767.68. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner held the market value of the business of the firm to be more than 15 per cent, of the consideration shown in the sale deed for the transfer of the business, the fair market value" as assessed by the Inspecting Assistant Coqnmis-sioner being Rs. 69,26,000.

3. The sale price of the business of the assessee-firm was credited to the accounts of the partners of the firm, that is, the petitioners. Later, when the fair market value was assessed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner at Rs. 69,26,000, the difference between the price as shown in the sale deed and that a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top