SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(P&H) 534

I.S.TIWANA, B.S.NEHRA
Ranjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Pavittar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

I.S.TIWANA, J.

1. The matter is before us on a reference to answer the following question :-

"Whether a wife who has voluntarily surrendered her right to maintenance in divorce proceedings would not be entitled to claim subsequently maintenance allowance under S. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure."

It arises from the following facts :-

2 As a result of the proceedings initiated by Ranjit Kaur petitioner under Ss. 12 and 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the learned Additional District Judge, Sangrur, vide his order dated 1/06/1987, granted a decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent of the parties. During those proceedings, she made his statement :-

"I have heard the above statement of respondent and is correct. I cannot live in the house of respondent as wife. Our child resides with respondent for which I have no objection and there is his benefit in living with the respondent. I relinquish my rights to my maintenance and to take child. I can avail the legal remedies for taking my articles back."

Thereafter she filed the present application under S. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on 13-8-1987 claiming maintenance from the respondent at the rate of Rs. 500.00









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top