HARPHUL SINGH BRAR
R. M. Yadav, Field Representative Basf India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar Bansal – Respondent
Harphul Singh Brar, J.
1. Both Criminal Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 1829-M of 1990 and 4128-M of 1990 will be disposed of by a single order as they arise out of a single complaint filed by the complainant Vinod Kumar Bansal, under sections 420/406/120-B, Indian Penal Code, against six persons including the four petitioners in these two applications.
2. The three petitioners in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 1829-M of 1990 have stated that petitioner P. Kaushik is Assistant Manager (Marketing) BASF India Ltd. Petitioner R.N. Yadav is Field Representative of the said Company and both these petitioners have their headquarters at Delhi and do not deal with any distributor directly for their products. Petitioner Jagdish Kanniayan is partner of Firm Pavan and Company and is distributor of BASF India Ltd. at Kurukshetra. It is further stated that BASF India Ltd., at New Delhi cancelled the distributorship of their products given to Messrs V. K. Sales Corporation, Mandi Dabwali. Vinod Kumar Bansal complainant is the proprietor of the said Firm. The complainant felt that the same has been done at the instance of petitioner No. 3 by petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and the same ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.