SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(P&H) 526

HARPHUL SINGH BRAR
R. M. Yadav, Field Representative Basf India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar Bansal – Respondent


Judgment

Harphul Singh Brar, J.

1. Both Criminal Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 1829-M of 1990 and 4128-M of 1990 will be disposed of by a single order as they arise out of a single complaint filed by the complainant Vinod Kumar Bansal, under sections 420/406/120-B, Indian Penal Code, against six persons including the four petitioners in these two applications.

2. The three petitioners in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 1829-M of 1990 have stated that petitioner P. Kaushik is Assistant Manager (Marketing) BASF India Ltd. Petitioner R.N. Yadav is Field Representative of the said Company and both these petitioners have their headquarters at Delhi and do not deal with any distributor directly for their products. Petitioner Jagdish Kanniayan is partner of Firm Pavan and Company and is distributor of BASF India Ltd. at Kurukshetra. It is further stated that BASF India Ltd., at New Delhi cancelled the distributorship of their products given to Messrs V. K. Sales Corporation, Mandi Dabwali. Vinod Kumar Bansal complainant is the proprietor of the said Firm. The complainant felt that the same has been done at the instance of petitioner No. 3 by petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and the same ha








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top