SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(P&H) 468

S.D.BAJAJ, HARMOHINDER KAUR SANDHU
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Buta Singh – Respondent


Judgment

S.D.Bajaj, J.

1. Drugs Inspector Satinder Pal Singh Bhatia along with Dr. Sadhu Ram Gupta, Senior Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Bhagta, visited the shop of Buta Singh accused in village Akalia Jalal, tehsil Rampura Phool, district Bhatinda on 8th April, 1981, and found therein 8 types of drugs defined in this Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

2. On being charged with the commission of offences under section 27(a)(ii) read with section 28 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, accused Buta Singh pleaded `not guilty thereto and claimed to be tried. Vide its impugned judgment dated 24th November, 1982 learned trial court acquitted him of the charge holding that the stock of drugs available with the accused had not been proved to have been kept for sale. Feeling aggrieved therefrom State of Punjab has filed Criminal Appeal No. 355-DBA of 1983 in this Court.

3. We have heard Shri Randhir Singh, AAG Punjab for the appellant State, Shri A.S. Kalra. Advocate, for the respondent and have carefully perused the relevant material on record.

4. In the course of his statement under section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code accused Buta Singh stated, "I am innocent, my mother is a





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top