SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(P&H) 437

G.C.GARG
Veena Rani Widow – Appellant
Versus
Mangat Ram – Respondent


Judgment

1. Krishan Partap was employed with M/s. Punjab Wireless Systems Ltd. , Chandigarh. He died on 19-5-1984 during the course of employment. The dispute in the present case is between the widow on the one side and the parents of Krishan Partap on the other regarding entitlement of amount payable under the Accidental Benefit Policy with the New India Assurance Company (hereinafter referred to as the Company) and some payments payable by the employer of the deceased such as gratuity, provident fund and arrears of pay etc.

2. Mangat Ram and Smt. Lai Devi father and mother of the deceased filed a suit for declaration that they were entitled to various amounts of their deceased son being his heirs. The suit was resisted by the widow. The trial Court by judgment and decree dated 8-1-1985 came to the conclusion that plaintiff No.2 (mother) was entitled to the estate of the deceased to the extent of half share including the half share of the amount of Rs.50,000/- payable by the Company on account of the Accident Benefit Policy. On appeal, learned Additional District Judge affirmed all the findings recorded by the trial. Court and dismissed the appeal by judgment and decree dated Janua




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top