SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(P&H) 103

J.V.GUPTA
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Dutt Prasher – Respondent


Judgment

J.V.Gupta, J.

1. This is tenants revision petition against whom eviction order has been passed an application under Section 13-A, of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, as amended.

2. According to the landlord Shiv Dutt Pr0ashar, (now deceased) he was a "specified landlord", whereas Om Parkash. petitioner. was a tenant in respect of the rooms for the last many years at the rate of Rs. 50/ per month and was also in arrears of rent with effect from February 1, 1986. According to him, he was is service in the Indian Railways and retired in July, 1977. Since he did riot owe and possess any suitable accommodation in Hoshiarpur where he intended to reside, the two rooms, the verandah and the kitchen bad fallen to his share in the family partition. They are a part and parcel of the residential building. They were being used as such by him, Be could not enjoy the remaining rooms in his possession in the absence of the two rooms, in dispute, for the purpose of his considerce; hence he filed the ejectment application on November 17, 1986.

3. The tenant was allowed the permission to contest the application. In the written statement, be denied the allegations made in the ejectm





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top