SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(P&H) 119

J.V.GUPTA
Kartar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ramtej Pal – Respondent


Judgment

J.V.Gupta, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the Rent Controller dated March 18,1988, whereby the application under Section 13 A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act as amended, was dismissed ex-parte.

2. The landlord filed the ejectment application under Section 13-A of the Act aforesaid. Notice of the same in the form prescribed under Sub-section (J) of section i8-Aofthe Act, was given to the landlord. Summons were served on him on March 9, 1988 According to the said summons, the tenant was to appear before the Rent Controller within 15 days of the service thereof and to obtain the leave of the Controller to oppose the application for eviction under Section 13-A. Before the expiry of 15 days from the service of the summons, the learned Rent Controller dismissed the ejectment application on March 18, 1988, without waiting for the affidavit, if any, of the tenant in reply to the ejectment application under Section 13-A.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the procedure followed by the Rent Controller was wrong and illegal. Since the tenant was entitled to obtain the leave of the Rent Controller within 15 days of the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top