SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 846

S.S.GREWAL
Ratan Kumar Modi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

, J.

1. The petition under Sec.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure relates to quashment of complaint, copy whereof is Annexure P I, and the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhuri, dated 4th December, 1989, copy whereof is Annexure P-2 for summoning the present petitioners as accused, on the basis of the said complaint under Sec.420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. In brief, the facts relevant for disposal of ibis case, as emerge, on the basis of the complaint filed by Paw an Kumar Garg, are that he and his brother Prem Chand entered into an oral agreement with the accused (Present petitioners) for purchase of Modi Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory situated at Nabha in March, 1989. Om Parkash, Rajnish Bansal and Kewal Krishan were also present at the time when the alleged oral agreement of sale was entered into, and in consequence thereof, the complainant and his brother Prem Chand paid Rs.65,000/- to each of the accused vide Bank Drafts No.290560/ 296/89 and 290561/297/89 dated 21-3-1989 drawn on Punjab National Bank and payable to the accused at Delhi. The payment of these two drafts was received by the accused It was further pleaded that the complaina






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top