SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 729

G.R.MAJITHIA
Garja Singh – Appellant
Versus
Surjit Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

1. The unsuccessful plaintiffs have come up in second appeal against the judgment and decree of the first appellate Court which, on appeal, affirmed those of the trial Judge and dismissed their suit for possession of the suit land and also for perpetual injunction. The facts :-

Gulaba (since deceased) was the last male owner of the property in dispute. He died on 5/09/1969. The plaintiffs claim themselves to be the grandsons of fathers brother of the deceased. They also set up a will allegedly executed by the deceased on 16/08/1969 in their favour. The relationship of defendant No.1 with the deceased was denied. It was denied that she was validly married to the deceased. Karewa Nama dated 28/10/1965 alleged to have been executed between defendant No.1 and the deceased was merely a paper transaction. In the Karewa Nama it was recited that defendant No. 1 was married to Bishan Singh who had died about four years back. But in fact, said Bishan Singh had died on 22/04/1964. The mutation of inheritance of the deceased was sanctioned in favour of defendant No. 1 and this led to the filing of the instant suit.

2. Defendant No. 1 denied the allegations made in the plaint and claime





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top