SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 734

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
S.S.Grewal, J.
Lajja Ram
Versus
State Of Haryana
Criminal Misc. No. 11048 of 1990,
Decided On : OCTOBER 12, 1990

The court considered the insufficiency of evidence and the petitioner's entitlement to bail based on the circumstances of the case.

Headnote:

Circumstantial Evidence - Extra-judicial Confession - The court considered the case of circumstantial evidence and the petitioner's extra-judicial confession regarding the assault on the deceased. The post-mortem report did not reveal head injuries or the cause of death. The petitioner was granted bail without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was accused of assaulting the deceased after a dispute over goats, with an extra-judicial confession as evidence. The post-mortem report did not reveal the cause of death.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the release of the petitioner on bail without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Issues: Circumstantial evidence, extra-judicial confession, post-mortem report, bail

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the cause of death and the petitioner's entitlement to bail.

Final Decision: The petitioner was granted bail upon furnishing two heavy sureties to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala.

Judgment

S.S.Grewal, J.

1. Heard. This is a case of circumstantial evidence. On behalf of the prosecution it was submitted that the petitioner made extra-judicial confession before Bachan Singh to the effect that he had given lathi blows to the deceased after the latter had refused to give his goats to the accused-petitioner, regarding which some payment had been made by the accused-petitioner to the deceased earlier. Post-mortem report does not reveal injury on the head of the deceased nor does it reveal that any underlying bone of the head had been fractured. The doctor who conducted the post-mortem has given the duration of the death as 3 to 5 days but he has not been able to give any opinion about the case of death. The occurrence allegedly took place on or about 7th of May, 1990.

2. Without expressing any opinion concurring the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing two heavy sureties to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top