SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 758

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
M.R.Agnihotri, J.
Gram Panchayat Through Its Sarpanch
Versus
Director Consolidation Of Holdings
of,
Civil Writ Petition No. 1329 of 1988,
Decided On : NOVEMBER 5, 1990

The land deducted from the holdings of the proprietors during consolidation proceedings should be redistributed amongst the proprietors prorata.

Headnote:

Consolidation of Holdings - Common Purposes of a Village - Redistribution of Land - The court upheld the reservation of land for the common purposes of the village and ruled that the land deducted from the holdings of the proprietors should be redistributed amongst the proprietors prorata.

Fact of the Case:

The controversy arose during consolidation proceedings under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, regarding the redistribution of land reserved for the common purposes of the village.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the land deducted from the holdings of the proprietors should be redistributed amongst the proprietors prorata, and the actions of the consolidation authorities were not illegal despite the delay in redistribution.

Issues: The narrow point for consideration was whether the remaining land, after fulfilling the common purposes, should be redistributed back to the proprietors or allowed to remain with the Panchayat for income.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous judgments and the Full Bench judgment of the court, which consistently held that the land deducted from the holdings of the proprietors should be redistributed amongst the proprietors prorata.

Final Decision: All the petitions were dismissed with no order as to costs.

Judgment

, J.

1. The short question of law in this bunch of C. W P. Nos.1329 of 1388, 6179 of 1985 and Nos.686, 1554, 1565, 1566, 1631, 1632, 1633, 1844, 3658 and 3659 of 1987, as also 1039 of 1988, being identical all these petitions are being disposed of by one and the same judgment

2. During consolidation proceedings under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, certain area of land can be earmarked for the "common purposes of a village by imposing cut on the holdings of the proprietors of the village. A contoversy arose in this court in a number of cases where different entries in revsnue record were interpreted to mean that the land reserved for the common purposes of the village had the effect of depriving the landowners, that is, the original proprietors of the village by vesting the land permanently in the Gram Panchayat. The reservation of land for the common purposes was challenged but the same has since been upheld by various decisions of this Court. In that context, the narrow point for consideration which falls for adjudication in the present cases is, as to whether once a certain area of land is earmarked by imposing a pro rata cut on the holdings of the proprietors and all the common purposes for which the land was taken stand fully satisfied by the utilization of the land required for each such purpose, the remaining that is Bachat (laud) should be redistributed back to the proprietors from whom it was taken or if should be allowed to remain with the Panchayat for income of the Panchayat by leasing it out to the leasees-Harijans or non-Harijans, village proprietors, etc.

3. After the controversy was settled by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Gram Panchayat Sadhraur (Formerly Dhumma) etc. V/s. Baldev Singh and Ors. , 1977 P. L. J.276. the consistent view is that the land (Bachat) deducted from the holdings of the proprietors should be redistributed amongst the proprietors prorata (Hasab Resad Khewat ). For authority, reference be made to the judgment of D S Tewatia, J. in Gurdial Singh and Ors. V/s. The State of Haryana and Ors. , 1979 P. L. J.350. and Des Raj and Anr. V/s. The Gram Sabha of Village Ladhot and Anr. , 1981 P. L. J.300. by J. V. Gupta J. (as his Lordship then was)

4. Precisely, this very view has been taken by the Director/additional Director, Consolidation of holdings, in the present writ petitions and the cases have been remitted by issuing the directions to the Consolidation Officers for redistribution of land to the original proprietors from whom it was taken during consolidation pro rata by defining the shares of the right holders. These orders are sought to be challenged on the ground that entries like Hasab Rasad Khewat Jumla Mushtarka Malkan or Jumla Malkan Wa Digar Haqdarcn Azi Hasab Rasad Raqba, do not entitle the right-holders to claim this lard once the same was earmarked and reserved for common purposes, The plea taken by the Gram Panchayats and lessees of the Panchayats is wholly without any basis in view of the aforesaid judgments.

5. Before parting, it may be noticed, to be fair to the petitioner, that the course of action adopted by she consolidation officers was also sought to be challenged on the ground that the original proprietors from who land was taken during consolidation have approached the consolidation authorities after a considerably long period and that too direct under Sec.42 of the said Act of 19 8 I am not impressed by the argument as substantial justice has been done between the parties and if a mistake crept in during consolidation, that is, by either reserving the land more than what was required or by not immediatly redistributing it back after the consolidation proceedings were over, the same may be done now even after a lapse of quarter of a century or so. The action does not become in any way illegal or contrary to the statute. Rather, the consolidation authorities are to be encouraged for their arriving at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top