, J.

1. Two Civil Revisions arising between the same parties and out of the same suit are being disposed of by this order Civil Revision No.917 of 1990 has been filed by M/s Himachal Carpets and Rugs (India) and another --defendants against the order dated December 21, 1989, whereby application filed by the aforesaid defendants directing the plaintiff to produce notification/notifications authorising Shri S. P. Dhawan, Branch Manager to file the suit. Civil Revision No.955 of 1990 has been filed by the same defendants Against order dated March 1, 1990, whereby request of the defendants to summon a witness from the plaintiff Bank (State Bank of India) as defendants witness to produce the aforesaid notification was declined.

2. State Bank of India filed a suit for recovery of Rs.2,62,700/-against the defendants. The suit was filed through S. P. Dhawn, Branch Manager of the Bank. Competency of Shri S. P. Dhawan to file the suit was challenged apart from other pleas taken by the defendants. At the evidence stage the aforesaid two orders were passed.

3. No doubt in the order dated December 21, 1989, it is stated that notifications published in the Government Gazette could otherw