SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 469

A.L.BAHRI
Anupam Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Raveen Mohan Chaudhary – Respondent


Judgment

, J.

1. This order will dispose of an application tiled under Sec.24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Some of the facts which are not disputed are as under.

2. Divorce was granted by the trial Court on an petition under Sec.13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. The said petition was supported by affidavits filed by both the parties and thereafter the Court also recorded statements of the parties In the statement of the wife Smt. Anupam Chaudhary it was specifically admitted that she will have no further claim for maintenance.

3. Appeal stands admitted on the ground that consent for the divorce was obtained by fraud. It is not necessary at this stage to refer to the merits of the appeal. Only a petition under Sec.24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is under consideration at this stage. It is asserted on behalf of the husband that when the matter was settled a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- was paid the wife Smt. Anupam Chaudhary. This fact is denied. There is no mention in the proceedings of trial Court regarding payment of this amount. Sec.24 of the Hindu Marriage Act reads as under : " 24 Maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings:-

Where in any proceedings under this Act it appears to the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top