SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 499

J.V.GUPTA
Jeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

, J.

1. This will also dispose of Civil Revision No.451 of 1990 as the question involved is common in both the petitions.

2. Mohan Singh filed two suits for possession against Model Line Colonisers and Inderjit Singh Gujral, Managing Director of Colonisers. Both the suits were decreed up to the High Court. Two execution applications were filed in which warrants of possession have been issued. When the Bailiff reached the spot, the petitioners (objectors) resisted the possession as they were in possession of the suit property and bad constructed their houses thereon. The decree holder moved an application under Order 21, Rule 97, C. P. C. complaining of such resistence or obstruction and sought police help. The objectors then made an application dated 9th June, 1989, for setting aside the said order granting police help and for withdrawal of warrants of possession. The said application was resisted on behalf of the decree-holder. The Executing Court found that the application was without any merit as their names had not been recorded in the Khasra giraawari, a copy of which was placed on the record by the decree-holder. According to the Executing Court, the judgment debtors







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top