SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 435

A.L.BAHRI
Tarlok Singh – Appellant
Versus
Parsinno – Respondent


Judgment

, J.

1. This revision is directed against the order dated December 23, 1988, passed by Sub-Judge 1st Class, Batala, rejecting application filed under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the defendants for amendment of the written statement.

2. In the written statement, originally, para 3, as mentioned, reads as under :-

- "that para No.3 is wrong and is strongly denied. The deceased Shri Sadhu Singh has been given shamlat land which falls outside Lal Lakir, by the Gram Panchayat Ghoman, Tehsil Batala, on the basis of his belonging to the Scheduled Caste community, about 15/18 years back, on which the deceased Shri Sadhu Singh raised construction of two rooms with the help of the defendants and started living together as joint family. The defendants had already been given the possession of the house by the deceased Shri Sadhu Singh during his life time, and therefore, it could not be said that the defendants illegally (possessed it) That the deceased Shri Sadhu Singh made a Will, bequea thing his house comprising two rooms in favour of the defendant Mohinder Singh on dated 25-2-1983 at his house at village Ghoman, Tehsil Batala in the presence of some wi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top