SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 268

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
A.L.Bahri, J.
Gurdip Kaur
Versus
Balbir Singh
of,
F.A.O. No. 50 of 1989,
Decided On : APRIL 26, 1990

The wife's conduct of continuously giving threats of committing suicide and involving the husband and his relations in false cases amounted to cruelty entitling the husband to dissolution of marriage under Sec.13 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Headnote:

HINDU MARRIAGE ACT - SECTION 13 - CRUELTY - MENTAL TORTURE - THREATS OF SUICIDE - INTERPRETATION - COURT ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION - WIFE'S CONDUCT AMOUNTING TO CRUELTY - HUSBAND ENTITLED TO DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE.

Fact of the Case:

Wife filed an appeal against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Jalandhar, dissolving the marriage of the parties under Sec.13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on the petition filed by the husband. The wife alleged that the husband and his parents continued demanding articles of dowry such as scooter and her salary. She was ill-treated and tortured and on June 5, 1984, she was given beating and turned out of the house.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the husband was treated with cruelty by the wife and in the facts and circumstances of the case the cruelty was such that the husband could not live with the wife without endangering his life and thus the husband was entitled to dissolution of marriage.

Issues: Whether the wife's conduct amounted to cruelty entitling the husband to dissolution of marriage under Sec.13 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Ratio Decidendi: Cruelty can be physical as well as mental. It is not necessary that in all cases there should be physical cruelty. As in the case of the wife who is subjected to continuous taunts and nagging on account of non-bringing of the dowry articles, it would amount to cruelty as such consistent behaviour would put her in danger of her health and life to continue living with the other spouse. On the same ground, if the wife with her behaviour and conduct goes on continuously giving threats of committing suicide and thus involving the husband and his relations for the same, it would be putting the husband and his relations in fear of being involved in false cases which would amount to cruelty which is a ground for dissolution of marriage.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed and the judgment and decree of the trial Court, dissolving the marriage of the parties, were affirmed.

Judgment

, J.

1. Smt. Gurdeep Kaur, the wife, has filed this appeal against the judgment and decree of Additional District Judge, Jalandhar dated February 14, 1989 dissolving the marriage of the parties under Sec.13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on the petition filed by Balbir Singh, the husband.

2. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on October 12, 1983 at Jalandhar city. They lived together for about 3-1/2 years. During this period Gurdeep Kaur conceived a child, however, delivered a dead child. At the time of the marriage the husband was living in house No. B-14/908-A, Arjan Nagar, Jalandhar City along with his parents and other members of the joint family. Though the wife was loved and respected by members of the family, however, after about a month of the marriage the wife started asking the husband to have an other house to live separately from his parents. The husband having failed to persuade his wife to live jointly, ultimately arranged for a separate house. She all along insisted that if she would not be taken to a separate house, she would commit suicide. Even after shifting to the new house, she gave such threats of committing suicide. Earlier also she declined to take food prepared by the mother of the husband suspecting mixture of poison and gave a similar threat to commit suicide. As and when some relations visited the house, the wife refused to wish them and on one of the occasions she hurled shoe towards the petitioner. She had no interest in the house. She declined to do house-hold work stating that she was not the domestic servant. On June 2, 1984 she left the house to stay with her parents. She stayed there till July 13, 1985. Even thereafter her attitude towards the husband did not improve. In May, 1987 a separate house was arranged by the husband. All the allegations made in the petition were denied by the wife who inter alia alleged that the husband and his parents continued demanding articles of dowry such as scooter and her salary. In the marriage dowry articles worth Rs.1,00,000/- were given by her parents. Since such demands were not fulfilled she was ill-treated and tortured and on June 5, 1984, she was given beating and turned out of the house. The husband and his mother visited their house on June 8, 1984 and created a scene in the street to defame her and her parents. She suffered shock on this illtreatment and gave birth to a pre-mature baby on June 13, 1984 who was already dead. The husband and his relations did not visit the hospital on the birth of the child. Panchayats were arranged but to no effect. Her brother had settled abroad and on that account the husband and her in-laws demanded scooter and V. C. R. These demands were not met. She was so much harassed that once she was compelled to commit suicide. In the replication the husband reiterated the stand while denying the allegations of the wife. The trial proceeded on the following issues : - (1) Whether the petitioner is entitled to the decree of divorce OPA. (2) Relief.

3. Both parties led oral evidence. Balbir Singh husband appeared as PW 1. His father Sadhu Singh PW 2 and Hans Raj PW 3 were produced by him. On the other hand Gurdeep Kaur appeared as RW 1. Mohan Singh RW 2 and Banta Singh RW 3 were produced by her.

4. The Additional District Judge on perusal of the evidence produced found the story put forth by the husband as correct and held that the husband was treated with cruelty by the wife and in the facts and circumstances of the case the cruelty was such that the husband could not live with the wife without endangering his life and thus the husband was entitled to dissolution of marriage and the decree was passed.

5. I have heard counsel for the parties and have also perused the evidence produced in the case. During arguments on behalf of the husband, an application under Order 41 Rule 27 read with Sec.151 of the Civil Procedure Code has been filed taking into consideration copy of the criminal complaint filed by the wif






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top