SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 248

A.L.BAHRI
Sarup Chand – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Chand – Respondent


Judgment

, J.

1. This revision petition has been filed by the plaintiffs, Sarup Chand and another against order dated September 10,1988 passed by the Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra, dismissing their application for review of an earlier order passed by the Additional District Judge, dated June 3, 1987.

2. Sarup Chand and another filed a suit for possession by ejectment of Jagdish Chand tenant from the property in suit which was let out on February 1, 1980. The construction of the building was alleged to have been completed in the year 1973 and thus, the provisions of the Rent Act were not applicable to the case. The suit was filed on April 16, 1982 which was decreed by the trial Court on June 3, 1985. Jagdish Chand tenant filed an appeal which was pending before the Additional District Judge, and was allowed on June 3, 1987 on the alleged statement made by counsel for the landlords, respondents in the said appeal The review application was filed, because the learned counsel who appeared in the appeal, had no authority to make such a statement. The review application was dismissed on the ground that Shri R. K. Bansal, Advocate, had been putting in appearance on behalf of Shri



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top