A.P.CHOWDHRI
Ram Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Bhale Ram – Respondent
, J.
1. The material facts which are necessary for the disposal of this revision petition are that the petitioners obtained a decree for joint possession against the respondents from the court of learned Additional District Judge, Jind, on 10-6-1988, Regular Second Appeal filed by the respondents against the said judgment and decree was dismissed on 17-3-1989. The petitioners took out execution of the decree on 19-7 1988 and, inter alia, prayed for issuance of warrant for actual possession. On 2-12-1988 such warrants were issued by the executing Court of Subordinate Judge 1st Class, Narwana. In compliance with the warrant of possession, the revenue authorities delivered actual possession of the land is question to the petitioners on 26-12-1988. As some crop was standing at the time of delivery of possession, a certain amount of compensation was assessed which the decree holder was required to deposit in the executing Court. The judgment debtor i. e. the respondents made an application on 5-1-1989 that as the decree itself was for joint possession, actual possession could not be delivered and that possession could not be delivered and that possession be restored to them. Aft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.