SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 221

S.D.BAJAJ
Mohinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

S.D.Bajaj, J.

1. Mihan Singh needed a copy of the jamabandi of his agricultural lands situated in the revenue estate of Barsat in Patiala district of Punjab State. Accused Mohinder Singh was then the Halqa Patwari. Joginder Singh son of Mihan Singh contacted the accused on 5th May, 1981 who demanded Rs. 100/- (rupees one hundred only) by way of illegal gratification for its supply. Matter was reported to the Vigilance Inspector Santokh Singh of Patiala. The Vigilance Inspector got the raid conducted after completing procedural formalities. Harchand Singh of Electricity Department was joined as shadow witness in the raid. The tainted money after being passed by Joginder Singh to the accused was got recovered from the pocket of the bushirt worn by accused at the relevant time. After completion of the legal formalities, accused Mohinder Singh Revenue Patwari of Halqa Barsat aforesaid was prosecuted u/s 5(1)(d) read with S. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 and Sec. 161 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned Special Judge Patiala convicted him of the commission of both the offences aforesaid and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top