SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 110

S.D.BAJAJ, K.S.BHALLA
Jai Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

S.D.Bajaj, J.

1. Accused appellants Balwant Singh and Jai Singh are both sons of Ajmer Singh. Ajmer Singh their father was lessee of 16/17 killas of panchayat land in village Mohan for two years from 1982 to 1984. Thereafter the Panchayat decided to get this land vacated from Ajmer Singh and get eucalyptus tress planted therein from the Forest Department. They obtained an order of ejectment against. Ajmer Singh in February, 1985. Ajmer Singh then filed a civil suit for restraining the Panchayat from planting eucalyptus trees in the aforesaid land. This was dismissed in June, 1985. Thereafter the Panchayat got eucalyptus trees planted in their land from the Forest Department; after getting it vacated from Ajmer Singh. Action of the Panchayat, however, made Ajmer Singh and his sons the sworn and bitterest enemies of Sarpanch Ram Singh and member Panchayat Gurpal Singh; who were both instrumental in getting the land vacated from Ajmer Singh. Gurbax Singh and Sukhdev Singh are both alleged to have evicted Ajmer Singh from this land. Ajmer Singh and his sons were, therefore, after their blood as well on account of all these persons having deprived them of the means of their live


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top