SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 103

JAI SINGH SEKHON
Renu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

1. The accused-petitioners have sought: the quashment of FIR No. 21 dt. 7-1-1988 for offences u/Ss.498-A, 109 and 406, Penal Code registered against them at Police Station City Panipat on the complaint of Harbhagwan Singh, brother of Smt. Raj Rani. According to the allegations in the first information report Smt. Raj Rani was married with Ashok Kumar accused-petitioner on 4-6-1979. Lekh Raj and Krishna Rani are the parents of aforesaid Ashok Kumar while Karam Chand and Kamlesh are his brothers and Renu is his sister. It is alleged that parents of Smt. Raj Rani had spent Rs.85,000.00 on her marriage but Smt. Raj Ranis in-laws being not satisfied with the dowry, started maltreating her and made her life miserable. It is further maintained that even after the marriage, the complainant gave Rs.8000/ -for the refrigerator and promised to give scooter whenever he will be able to manage money but the in-laws of Smt. Raj Rani kept on troubling her and ultimately she was turned out about six years prior to the filing of the complaint. The complaint was filed on 7-1-1988. Thereafter, Ashok Kumar petitioner filed a petition for divorce u/S. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act levelling false













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top