SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(P&H) 804

G.C.MITTAL
Surjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Beant Singh – Respondent


Judgment

G.C.Mital, J.

1. There is a residential house in Ludhiana which is jointly owned by four brothers, two out of whom were in service and thus become specified landlords for the purpose of Sec.13-A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (as amended ). (Hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The plan is before me. On the back there are servant quarters and the garage and in front is the main bungalow. Right portion of the main bungalow, is in possession of Lajwant Singh (respondent No.4), one of the four brothers who has retired from Navy Service. Left portion is in possession of two tenants, rear left is with the tenants in this revision petition and the other portion consisting of three rooms in front, is in possession of Jaswant Singh tenant. The premises in dispute consist of two rooms, one store, on kitchen and common varandah and courtyard. For the vacation of the aforesaid portion of the house, Dr. Beant Singh, who retired as Principal Scientific Officer, Ministry of Defence, filed an application against Capt Surjit Singh and his wife, within one year before his retirement, under Sec.13-A of the Act, he retired on 31-12-1986. The Rent Controller has ordered e



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top