SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(P&H) 713

G.R.MAJITHIA
New India Assurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Punjab Government – Respondent


Judgment

1. This judgment will dispose of F. A. O. No.132 of 1987 filed by the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. , and Cross-Objection No.1 C11 of 1988 filed by Pritam Bus Service, respondent No.3, and Surinder Singh, respondent No.4.

2. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the appellant") has challenged the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal only to the extent to which it has been held liable to pay the amount of compensation. In cross-objection, respondents Nos.3 and 4 pleaded that it was a case of composite negligence and not contributory negligence and the liability of all the respondents ought to have been joint and several.

3. In order to appreciate the submissions raised by learned counsel for the appellant, it is necessary to submit a few facts stated in the pleadings : THE FACTS :

4. Avtar Singh, the deceased, was travelling in bus bearing registration No. PAB 7027 owned by Pritam Bus Service, respondent No.1, and driven by Surinder Singh, respondent No.2 on the fateful day May 4, 1985, When the bus reached near Attarsar at a distance of about four miles from Doraha, another bus, bearing registration No. PJG 223, owned by the Punjab Roadways ca



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top