SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(P&H) 682

G.R.MAJITHIA
Woolways, Shop-cum-office, Chandigarh – Appellant
Versus
Central Bank Of India, Chandigarh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the Subordinate Judge dated August 1, 1988 whereby he refused to review his earlier order dated February 23, 1987.

2. Normally this court will not interfere with interlocutory orders. In this case, I am satisfied that the learned trial judge has dealt with the matter in a most cursory manner. He did not try to understand the case pleaded by the J. Ds and hasten to dispose of the applications filed by them in a summary manner.

3. The respondent bank filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 97,541.15 with interest against the petitioners and others. The suit was decreed on March 23, 1982 and the learned Judge directed that the decretal amount be paid in instalments of Rs. 3000.00 per month from April to September and at the rate of Rs. 5000.00 per month from October to March every year and the defendant was enjoined to make payment of the first instalment of Rs. 3000.00 in May 1982.

4. The Decree-holder took out execution which was registered as Execution No. 34-A/27-3-85. The petitioner Judgment Debtor (hereinafter referred to JD) filed objections under Sec.47 of the Code of Civil Procedure stating that the decree stood sati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top