SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(P&H) 80

BHANDARI, TEK CHAND
A. L. Mehra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment

Bhandari, J.

1. These several petitions arise out of the case which is known popularly as the Budget Leakage-Case.

2. On the 9th March, 1956 a report was received at the Police Station that certain Government Officers had made an unauthorised disclosure of Union Governments budget proposals for the year 1956-57 to some unauthorised persons. The Police registered a case under Sections 165A, 120B of the Penal Code, Section 5 of the Prevention off Corruption Act and Section 5 of the Official Secrects Act. and apprehended a number of persons including F, X. Jacobs, General Foreman of the Rashtrapati Bhawan Printing Press, D P. Chadha, a reskieiit of Delhi, A. L. Mehra, Sales Manager of Mercury Paints and Varnishes, Bombay, N. L. More, a millowner of Bombay and H. G. L, Kothari, a resident o[ Bombay. On the 23rd March, 1956, Mr. D. D. Sharma, Additional District Magistrate, Delhi, tendered a pardon to Mehra under Section 337 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on condition of his making a full and true disclosure of the whole of the circumstances within his knowledge relative to the offence and to every person concerned. With the exception oi the approver who was granted a pardon






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top