SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(P&H) 127

BISHAN NARAIN
Durga Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Bishan Narain, J.

1. Durga Singh has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to get the order of his dismissal from the Police Force quashed, The facts leading to his dismissal are not in dispute. He was recruited to Punjab Police Force as a Foot Constable in 1949 by the Superintendent of Police, Simla. During his posting at Police Station Simla East he was prosecuted under Section 34 (6), Police Act, 1861. He was convicted and ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 20/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for one week. The finding of the learned Magistrate who convicted him was that he was found heavily drunk on the roadside in Sanjauli near the tunnel and abusing passers by on 2-10-1945 at about 8 p.m.

One Kesho Ram who had been beaten by him at that time reported the matter at the Police Station Simla East with the resulting prosecution mentioned above. In the trial Durga Singh admitted these facts. Departmental inquiry was held against him after his conviction. The Superintendent of Police, Simla, called upon him to show cause why he should not be dismissed from the police Force under Police Rule 16.2(2) for having become habituated















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top