SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(P&H) 13

D.FALSHAW
Seth Radhe Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ladli Parshad – Respondent


Judgment

Falshaw, J.

1. These three execution appeals Nos. 34-D, 76-C and 110-C of 1956 have been filed by Seth Radhey Lal in the following circumstances. Seth Mathura Parshad, who fs the respondent in two of the appeals, carried on a partnership firm called Mathura Parshad and Company along with his sons Seth Radliey Lal appel-lant and Seth Ladli Parshad who is the rescondent in the other appeal. In 1950 Ladli Parshad and Radhey Lal instituted a suit against their father for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts. The disputes between the parties were referred to the arbitration of Raja Ram a::d Ram Sarup who delivered their award on the 31st of October 1851.

2. The objections filed by Ladli Parshad and Mathura Parshad to the award were ultimately dismissed and the award was made a rule of the Court on the 9th of October 1954. The partner-ship firm had apparently owned and been operating three factories, the Lakshmi Ice Factory at Kauria Pul, the Ganesh Ice Factory and Seth Oil Mills at Ajmeri Gate and the Imperial Ice Factory to which a bungalow is attached in New, Delhi. The arbitrators assessed t e values of these properties respectively at Rs. 2,00,000/- 2,50,000/
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top