PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Kapur and Bishan Narain JJ.
Bal Mukand
Versus
Punjab State
Civil Writ Application No. 387 of 1955,
Decided On : DECEMBER 6, 1956
DISPLACED PERSONS (COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION) ACT, 1954 - SECTION 12 - VESTING OF EVACUEE PROPERTY IN CENTRAL GOVERNMENT - DEPUTY CUSTODIAN-GENERAL'S JURISDICTION TO PASS ORDER AFTER VESTING - WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH ORDER - JURISDICTION OF CIVIL COURTS BARRED.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, three brothers, challenged an order passed by the Deputy Custodian-General on 13th September 1955, allotting a house in dispute to Bahadur Chand, opposite party No. 4. The petitioners contended that the Deputy Custodian-General had become functus officio qua the matters which fell under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act as the property had vested in the Union under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 (Act No. 44 of 1954) and therefore the order was without jurisdiction.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the coming into force of the Displaced Persons Compensation Act had taken away the powers of the Custodian-General and now vested in another authority and there was no provision for continuing the proceedings which had been taken under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act and therefore any order passed by the Custodian-General was without jurisdiction.
Issues: Whether the Deputy Custodian-General had jurisdiction to pass the order on 13th September 1955 after the enactment of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on various provisions of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, including Sections 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 26, 27, 29, 36, and 40, as well as the rules and notifications made thereunder, to conclude that the powers of the Custodian-General under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act had been transferred to the managing officers or managing corporations appointed under the Displaced Persons Compensation Act and that the property in dispute had vested in the Central Government.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order passed by the Deputy Custodian-General on 13th September 1955, allotting the house in dispute to Bahadur Chand.
Bishan Narain, J.
1. One of the points raised in this petition is that the Deputy Custodian general could not pass any order on the revision pending before him after 24-3-1955 in view of Section 12 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1954. This point is being raised very frequently in this Court and I think it will be convenient if it is decided by a larger Bench. Let the case be placed before Hon ble Chief Justice for orders.
Kapur, J.
2 This is an application made under article 226 of the Constitution of India by three brothers, Bal Mukand, Rattan Lal and Raj Kumar minor sons of Pt. Hari Ram, for a writ of certiorari to quash an order made by Mr. Tara Chand Aggarwal, Deputy Custodian-General dated the 13th September 1955. The matter was originally placed before my learned brother Bishan Narain J. but considering the importance of the case he referred it to a Division Bench.
3. The dispute relates to House No. 26 in village Karyan Pehlwan in the tahsil and district of Ferozepore. It appears that by a single sanad land measuring 83 standard acres and 13 1/4 units allotted in the names of the petitioners, although for purpose of calculating the area to be allotted to each one of the brothers the cut was made as if they were separate. On the 21st April 1951 the house in dispute was allotted to the three brothers as the biggest allottees. Bahadur Chand, opposite party No. 4, took an appeal to the Authorised Deputy Custodian but the allotment of the house in favour of the petitioners was maintained by order dated the 21st February 1952. On the 3rd November 1953 the Deputy Custodian-General remanded the case to the Authorised Deputy Custodian with a direction for re-allotment as claimed, but on the 2nd December 1954 the Authorised Deputy Custodian again held that the three brothers were entitled to the house, being the biggest allottees.
The Deputy Custodian-General by his order, of the 13th September 1955 considered that each one of the brothers was a separate allottee and therefore the brothers were not bigger allottees than Bahadur Chand and therefore directed that the house should be allotted to Bahadur Chand. The three brothers have come to this Court and their plea is that because of the enactment of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act Of 1954 (Act No. 44 of 1954) the Deputy Custodian-General at the date of the order i. e. 13th September 1955, had become functus officio qua the matters which fell under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act as the property had vested in the Union under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act and therefore the order was without jurisdiction.
4. In order to determine the question which has been raised, it is necessary to examine the scheme of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation). Act and the rules and orders made thereunder. Under Section 12 of this Act the Central Government has been given the power to acquire any evacuee property for rehabilitation of displaced persons. Section 12 (1) gives this power in the following words:-
-
"12 (1), If the Central Government is of opinion that it is necessary to acquire any evacuee property for a public purpose, being a purpose connected with the relief and rehabilitation of displaced persons, including payment of compensation to such persons, the Central Government may at any time acquire such evacuee property by publishing in the Official Gazette a notification to the effect that the Central Government has decided to acquire such evacuee property in pursuance of this section."
Under Sub-section (2) of Section 12 after a notification has been made in regard to any particular property, the right title and interest of the evacuee are extinguished and the evacuee property vests absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances. By Subsection (4) of this section all evacuee property so acquired forms part of the compensation pool.
5. Section 13
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.