SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(P&H) 70

BHANDARI, BISHAN NARAIN
Gopi Parshad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Bhandari, J.

1. This petition under Article 236 of the Constitution raises the question whether the imposition authorised by the Punjab Tobacco Vend Pees Act, 1964, constitutes a tax or a licence fee.

2. The petitioner, who is carrying on business as a dealer in cigarettes and bidis in Sonepat, has been required to take on a distributing agents licence on payment of a licence fee of Rs. 500/-under Rule 4 of the rules framed under the Tobacco Vend Fees Act, 1954. He declines to take out the licence in question and challenges the validity of the rule on various grounds, among others, being that the State Government is imposing a tax in the garb of a licence fee, that the licence fee is discriminatory and that it amounts to unreasonable restriction on trade and business.

3. A licence fee on the sale of tobacco was imposed for the first time by the Punjab Tobacco Vend Pees Act, 1934, which was enacted with the object of regulating the sale of manufactured tobacco in municipal and certain other areas. Section 3 imposed a statutory obligation on all vendors of tobacco to take out a dealers licence and Section 4 declared that every licence shall be granted on payment of such fees










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top