SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(P&H) 84

BHANDARI
Bakshi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Buta Singh Kahan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This petition raises the question whether a certain agreement entered into between one Buta Singh and Baksha constitutes a deed of lease or a deed which merely secures the rent of the property.

2. It appears that one Bakshi Ram alias Bakhsha is the owner of a certain house situate in Ferozepur. On the 12th January 1946 he executed a deed of mortgage in a sum of Rs. 1,200/- in favour of Buta Singh. This was followed by a rent note dated the 15th July 1946 by which he agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 6/- per mensem by way of rent in respect of this property.

The house in question was later destroyed by floods and Baksha constructed a new house on same site. On the 13th November 1948 Baksha executed a fresh deed of mortgage In a sum of Rs. 2,600/- in favour of Buta Singh and on the sains day he agreed orally to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 8/- per mensem to Buta Singh who was the mortgagee with possession.

Baksha failed to pay the rent which was due from him and Buta Singh accordingly secured an order for the ejectment of Baksha which was later confirmed by the District Judge in appeal. Baksha has now presented an application under Article 227 of the Constitution.

3. Mr. Abnasha S



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top