SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(P&H) 49

BHANDARI, S.S.DULAT
Bal Krishan Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Bhandari, J.

1. This petition raises the question whether the petitioner has acquired a clear legal right to appointment as a Subordinate Judge in the Punjab.

2. Shri Bal Krishan Aggarwal, a law graduate of the Banaras University, appeared in the examination of candidates for appointment to the Judicial Branch of the Punjab Civil Service which was held in the year 1950 and obtained the 25th position in the order of merit. The first six candidates were selected for appointment as officiating Subordinate Judges in the regular cadre while eight of the remaining candidates, including the petitioner, were selected for appointment as Subordinate Judges on a temporary basis. In June 1954 the High Court addressed a communication to Government in which they stated that whereas the Honourable Judges were completely satisfied in regard to the character and ability of six of the temporary Subordinate Judges and could safely recommend them for appointment as officiating Subordinate Judges in the regular cadre they were unable to vouch for the character or reputation of the remaining two candidates, including the petitioner, and were unable to make a similar recommendation in their favou





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top