SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(P&H) 52

BHANDARI
Mohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lajya Ram – Respondent


Judgment

Bhandari, J.

1. This petition raises a questions upon the interpretation of the expression "resides" appearing in Section 20, Civil P. C.

2. The plaintiff is one Lajya Ram, a broker of Lahore while the defendants are Mr. M. S. Oberoi, Director of Oberoi Hotels Limited, and Rai Bahadur Jodha Mal, a well-known contractor of the Punjab. In the year 1946 Mr. Oberoi expressed a desire to purchase the Nedous Hotel at Lahore from Rai Bahadur Jodha Mal and requested the plaintiff to negotiate the purchase. The plaintiff brought the parties together and induced the owner to enter into an agreement for the sale of the property for a large sum of money. Mr. Oberot refused to purchase the property and the transaction could not be completed, the defendants declined to pay the commission to which the plaintiff considered himself entitled and the plaintiff accordingly brought a suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 79,500/-.

3. The defendant objected to the Jurisdiction of the Courts at Delhi to deal with the case, but the trial Court came to the conclusion that although no part of the cause of action had arisen in Delhi, Mr. Oberoi had been residing in Delhi not merely temporarily but fo



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top