BHANDARI
Mehra And Co. Tea Factory, Amritsar – Appellant
Versus
Khanayia Lal Pala Ram – Respondent
Bhandari, J.
1. An Authority constituted under the Payment of Wages Act decided to entertain, a claim under Section 25-P, Industrial Disputes Act, on the ground that a claim for compensation put forward by a retrenched employee falls within me ambit of the expression "wages" as defined in Section 2, Payment of Wages Act. The employer is dissatisfied with the order and has come to this Court in revision.
2. The expression "wages" as defined in Section 2(vi) of the Act of 1936:
"means all remuneration, capable of being expressed in terms of money, which would, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled, be payable, whether conditionally upon the regular attendance, good work or conduct or other behaviour of the person employed, or otherwise, to a person employed in respect of his employment or of work done in such employment, & includes any bonus or other additional remuneration of the nature aforesaid which would be so payable, and any sum payable to such person by reason of the termination of his employment. .....".
3. This definition may for convenience be split up into three portions. The first clause declares that wages means all remun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.