SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(P&H) 42

BHANDARI
Mehra And Co. Tea Factory, Amritsar – Appellant
Versus
Khanayia Lal Pala Ram – Respondent


Judgment

Bhandari, J.

1. An Authority constituted under the Payment of Wages Act decided to entertain, a claim under Section 25-P, Industrial Disputes Act, on the ground that a claim for compensation put forward by a retrenched employee falls within me ambit of the expression "wages" as defined in Section 2, Payment of Wages Act. The employer is dissatisfied with the order and has come to this Court in revision.

2. The expression "wages" as defined in Section 2(vi) of the Act of 1936:

"means all remuneration, capable of being expressed in terms of money, which would, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled, be payable, whether conditionally upon the regular attendance, good work or conduct or other behaviour of the person employed, or otherwise, to a person employed in respect of his employment or of work done in such employment, & includes any bonus or other additional remuneration of the nature aforesaid which would be so payable, and any sum payable to such person by reason of the termination of his employment. .....".

3. This definition may for convenience be split up into three portions. The first clause declares that wages means all remun


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top