SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(P&H) 7

KHOSLA, KAPUR
Income-tax Commissioner, Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Messrs. Birdhi Chand Girdhari Lal – Respondent


Judgment

KHOSLA, J.

1. This matter is concluded by two Division Bench decisions of this Court, Kalsi Mechanical Works, Nandpur v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Simla and Messrs. Padam Parshad Rattan Chand of Delhi v. Commissioner of Income-tax. It has been held in both these cases that where an oral partnership is alleged to have come into existence and this oral partnership was followed by a partnership deed executed after the accounting period the partnership cannot be registered as having taken place before and during the accounting year. The partnership is not in such cases entitled to registration under section 26A.

2. We accordingly answer the reference in these terms. The respondent will pay costs which we assess at Rs. 150.

KAPUR, J.

3 I agree.

4. Reference answered accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top