SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(P&H) 12

KAPUR, KHOSLA
Pandit Bros. – Appellant
Versus
ComOf Income Tax – Respondent


Judgment

Khosla, J.

1. This is a reference made to this Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, under Section 60 (1), Income-tax Act. The following question of law has been referred to this Court:

"Whether any addition may be made to the book version of business profits where no stock account is maintained, on the sole ground that the net profits disclosed appear to be insufficient in relation to the total turn-over?"

2. The assessee in this case is Messrs. Pandit Bros., Delhi, and the year of assessment is 1950-51. In order to understand the exact import of the issue involved it is necessary to set out briefly the facts which have given rise to this reference.

3. Messrs. Pandit Bros, had during the assessment year four branches:

(a) Chandni Chowk, Delhi,

(b) Connaught Place, New Delhi;

(c) Handicrafts, New Delhi; and

(d) The Mall, Simla.

Accounts of these four branches were maintained separately but since they were all owned by the same firm a consolidated statement of total profit and loss was prepared for the information of the Income-tax Officer. The Income-tax Officer on going through the accounts found that taxable profits should have been declared at a higher figur
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top