SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(P&H) 26

KHOSLA, BHANDARI
Ammar Ahmed Khan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Bhandari, J.

1. This first appeal raises the question whether a plot of land measuring 1035 square yards and situate along-side the city wall, old Delhi, is the property of Government or of Mst. Qalsum-ul-Nissa, defendant No. 1.

2. The plaintiffs in this case are the Governor-General of India in Council and the Delhi Improvement Trust while the contesting defendants are Mst. Qalsum-ul-Nissa, defendant No. 1 and Messrs Ravi Brothers, defendant No. 2.

3. On 30-4-1947 the plaintiffs brought a suit against the defendants for the possession of a plot of land, 1988 square yards in extent, situate outside the city wall of Delhi and for the issue of an Injunction requiring the defendants to close the five doors which were opened by them after breaking open a part of the city wall in June or July 1946. The defendants admitted that the plaintiffs were owners of a portion of the plot measuring 953 square yards but denied their claim in respect of the remaining portion measuring 1035 square yards, hereinafter referred to as the plot of land in question. They stated that the plot of land in question has always been the property of Mst. Qalsum-ul-Nissa or her predecessors-in-interest, th





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top