SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(P&H) 120

BHANDARI
Jai Hind Timber Depot – Appellant
Versus
Gian Chand – Respondent


Judgment

Bhandari, J.

1. This petition must be allowed on the short ground that the order passed by the Court below does not appear to be consistent with the provisions of law.

2. It appears that the plaintiff brought a suit for the recovery of money. Summons were issued to the defendant but the latter failed to appear in Court, on 29-7-1952, the plaintiff made an application which is in the following terms :

"In the case noted above, the service of summons on the defendant, aforementioned, is difficult in the ordinary way, as the defendant conceals himself on hearing the news of the summons and intentionally evades the service thereof. It is, therefore, humbly prayed that under the above circumstances, service be effected on the defendant by the beat of drum and by affixing the copy of the summons on the Notice Board of the Court or as the Court may deem proper. Service may be got effected on him under Order 5, Rule 20, Civil P. C."

3. It was open to the Court either to accept or to reject this application but the order which was actually passed by the learned Subordinate judge is somewhat strange. On the 29th July he directed as follows ;

"The plaintiff has not attempted in gettin




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top