SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(P&H) 41

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Kapur and Sone JJ.
L.Lachman Das Nayar
Versus
Income-tax Officer, Amritsar
Civil Writ No. 147 of 1952,
Decided On : MAY 29, 1953

The judgment established the jurisdiction and scope of Article 226 in Income-tax cases and the applicability of section 109(b) and (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Headnote:

Appeal - Jurisdiction - Writ under Article 226 - Scope of Article 226 in Income-tax cases

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners applied for a writ under Article 226 which was dismissed by the Bench. The petitioners sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted leave to appeal under section 109(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure and section 109(c) as the scope of Article 226 in Income-tax cases had to be determined.

Issues: Scope of Article 226 in Income-tax cases, jurisdiction of the court

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the judgment of the Madras High Court in Royts of Garabandho, Sariapalli etc. v. Zamindar of Parlakimedi, which held that proceedings for the issuing of a writ of certiorari are original civil jurisdiction as opposed to criminal jurisdiction.

Final Decision: Leave to appeal was granted to the petitioners with costs in their favor.

Judgment

KAPUR & SONE, J.

1. This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under article 132(1) read with article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution of India and sections 109(b) and (c) and 110 and Order XLY, rules 2 and 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The present petitioners applied for issuing of a writ under article 226 which petition was dismissed by this Bench on the 15th of September, 1952. Counsel for the petitioner submits that this falls under section 109(b) of the code of Civil Procedure read with the relevant provisions of the Constitution, and he relies on a judgment of the Madras High Court in Royts of Garabandho, Sariapalli etc. v. Zamindar of Parlakimedi. There it was held that proceedings for the issuing of a writ of certiorari are original civil jurisdiction as opposed to criminal jurisdiction. Following this judgment we give leave to appeal under section 109(b) of the Code.

3. The case also falls under section 109(c) as the scope of article 226 in Income-tax cases has to be determined.

4. The petitioner will have costs in this Court. Counsel fee Rs. 100. Leave to appeal granted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top