SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(P&H) 154

BHANDARI, KAPUR, S.M.SONI
Gordhan Das, Baldev Das – Appellant
Versus
Governor General In Council – Respondent


Judgment

Bhandari, J.

1. The short point for decision in the present case is whether it is within the power of this Court to make a rule which has the effect of depriving a litigant of his right of appeal to the Supreme Court.

2. When the High Court at Simla was created in the year 1947 it was called upon to decide a large number of cases relating to the East Punjab which were pending in the High Court at Lahore. These cases could be disposed of either by increasing the number of Judges of this Court or by amending the rules so as to provide that certain second appeals which were being heard and disposed of by Benches of two Judges should in the future be heard and disposed of by a Judge sitting alone. As the second alternative was more in consonance with the financial resources of the State than the first, it was decided that all second appeals in which the value of the appeal does not exceed Rs. 2,000/- in a land suit or Rs. 5,000/- in a money or unclassed suit should in future be placed before and decided by a single judge. The new rule came into force on the 8th May 1951.

3. When the first batch of second appeals which were regulated by the new rule was placed before a learned J



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top