SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(P&H) 177

HARNAM SINGH, WESTON
Debi Parshad – Appellant
Versus
Jai Ram Dass – Respondent


Judgment

Harnam Singh, J.

1. In order to appreciate the points of law arising in Letters Patent Appeal No. 65 of 1951 it is essential to set out the facts of the case in some detail.

2. On the 29th of April, 1948, Jairam Das instituted civil suit No. 324 of 1948 for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts pleading that he was partner with Debi Parshad defendant No. 1 and Balkishan Das defendant No. 2 in the firm, the Ambala Flour Mills, Ambala City, the shares of the plaintiff, Debi Parshad and Balkishan Das being annas four, annas ten and annas two in a rupee respectively. The case of the plaintiff was that the period of partnership was two years, but if there was an extension of the lease of the Mills by the exercise of option given to the lessee under the lease deed, Exhibit D. 1, the partnership was to continue for the period of the lease. In the plaint it was said that Madan Lal son of the plaintiff, Baikunth Nath attorney of Debi Parshad and Balkishan Das defendant No. 2 were to work in the firm on salary fixed between the parties and that on the capital investments the partners were to be paid interest at six per cent, per annum.

3. In paragraph No. 3 of the plai







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top