SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(P&H) 45

K.R.PASSEY
Teja Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment

Passey, J.

1. This is an application under Section 226, Constitution of India, for issue of a writ of habeas corpus and for release of the detenu. Shri R. S. Piilta, District Magistrate, Patiala, on being satisfied that with a view to preventing him from acting in a manner prejudicial to the -seourity of the State or the maintenance of publics order, it was necessary to detain the petitioner, made an order in the exeroise of the powers conferred by Section 3 (2), Preventive Detention Act, 1950, that he be detained in the Central Jail. The grounds on which the detention order was based were supplied to the detenu that very day and they stated that he had in his speech in the Qaumi Sadhar Conference held at village Barketpur on 8/9-19-2006 incited the tenants against the biswedars, that he was a regular subscriber of communist literature and was circulating that literature among Comma-nist sympathisers, and that he was in communication with certain under ground Communists. In his application, the detenu has urged that the grounds of detention;, as supplied to him, are vague, insufficient and incomplete and that there was entirely no material in possession of the District Magi



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top