2007(2) LAW HERALD (P&H) (DB) 1560
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(DIVISION BENCH)
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S. Bhalla
Criminal Appeal No.104-DB of 2005
Mahabir
v.
State of Haryana
{Decided on 24/04/2007}
(B) Penal Code, 1860, Section 149--Unlawful assembly--Common object--Essential elements summed up:-
(i) There was an unlawful assembly as contemplated by Section 141;
(ii) The accused was a member of such assembly;
(iii) He had intentionally joined or continued in that unlawful assembly;
(iv) He knew of the common object of the unlawful assembly;
(v) An offence was committed by a member of the assembly;
(vi) Such offence was committed in prosecution of the common object of the assembly; or
(vii) As the members of the assembly knew that such offence was likely to be committed in prosecution of their common object. (Para 13)
(C) Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8--Motive-- It is neither obligatory nor incumbent on the part of the prosecution to prove the motive but if it can provide to the Court for appreciating the evidence, this would be additional circumstance to prove the chain of the version. (Para 11)
(D) Evidence Act, 1872, Section 8--Motive--Motive is not deciding factor in a criminal case and absence of motive does not speak of the innocence of the accused, where direct evidence against the accused is available on the record. (Para 13)
(E) Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 325, 148, 149--Unlawful assembly--Murder--Appellant ‘v’ was armed with an axe--Remaining accused were armed with wooden planks and lathis--Accused ‘v’ gave a fatal blow on the head of the deceased--Blow does not appear to have been in furtherance of common object--Other members of the unlawful assembly cannot be made liable for the offence committed by ‘v’--Appeal qua accused ‘v’ is dismissed and life imprisonment awarded to him maintained--However, other appellants were convicted under Sections 148, 323, 324 and 325 IPC--Protracted trial for 7 years--Lenient view taken--Period of sentence is reduced to one which they have already undergone. (Para 14 & 15)
H.S. Bhalla, J.:- By this common judgment we shall be disposing of two appeals, being Criminal No. 104-DB of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.33- SB of 2005 together as they arise out of the same occurrence.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15.12.2004 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, whereby he convicted the appellants under Sections 302/323/325/148 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. All the appellants were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code; rigorous imprisonment for six months under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code; rigorous imprisonment for four years under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code and they were ordered to pay fine of Rs.500/- and rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and they were ordered to pay fine of Rs.2000/-. In default of payment of fine, the appellants were directed to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
3. The facts required to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal are that on 1.6.2000 a wireless message was received from PGIMS Rohtak and on the basis of this message, police machinery was set into motion and Assistant Sub Inspector Manjit Singh rushed to the hospital, where the Medical Officer declared the injured Daya Nand unfit to make a statement and in such like circumstances, Smt. Santosh wife of Daya Nand (since deceased) suffered a statement, Ex. PQ, to the effect that on 31.5.2000 around 8.30 P.M. she along with her husband and son was sitting in the precinct of her house. She was attracted to the place of occurrence, when she heard the screams of Yudhbir in the form of “Mar Diya Mar Diya and Bachao Bachao”. She along with her husband rushed to the spot and found that accused Mahabir, Vinod, Sandeep, Bijender, Randhir, Ram Kumar, Smt. Sajna, Smt. Omli and Smt. Yashoda were causing injuries to Yudhbir. Vinod was armed with an axe, whereas other accused were having lathis. On the intervention of her husband, accused persons caught hold him. Accused Vinod inflicted axe on his head as a result of which, he fell down . Other accused persons also attributed injuries to him. She and her son raised an alarm, which attracted Attar Singh and Mir Singh to the spot and they tried to rescue them from the clutches of the accused. However, accused persons also caused injuries to her son Mandeep, Attar Singh and Mir Singh and then fled away. On the basis of this statement suffered by her, a case was registered. During the course of investigation, necessary formalities were completed by the Investigating Officer and the statements of the witnesses were also recorded. A supplementary charge sheet was presented against accused Sandeep, who was a minor at the time of occurrence, but accused Sandeep did not claim himself to be a juvenile as per his statement, recorded separately on 22.9.2000 and he was also sent up for trial along with others.
4. Charges under Sections 148/323/325/302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code were framed against all the accused, to which they did not plead guilty and claimed trial.
5. Prosecution, in order to prove its case, examined as many as 16 witnesses, namely, Ravinder Kumar, Draftsman (PW-1), Assistant Sub Inspector Hari Singh (PW-2), Head Constable Surinder Singh (PW-3), Constable Rajbir Singh (PW-4), Dharamvir Singh, retired Police Inspector (PW-5), Dr. P.D.Sharma, Senior Medical Officer, General Hospital, Bhiwani (PW-6), Inspector Mohinder Singh (PW-7), Dr. R.K.Wadhwa, District T.B.Officer, Rohtak (PW-8), Dr. Wazir Singh, Senior Medical Officer, General Hospital, Bhiwani (PW-9), Smt. Santosh Devi (PW-10), Yudhbir Singh (PW-11), Assistant Sub Inspector Manjit Singh (PW-12), Sub Inspector Ajaib Singh (PW-13), Balwan Singh, Record-Keeper, PGIMS, Rohtak (PW-14), Dr. Amar Jeet Singh, Deputy Medical Superintendent, PGIMS, Rohtak (PW-15)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.