SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1433

HEMANT GUPTA
Jai Chand – Appellant
Versus
Bag Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Hemant Gupta, J.:- The defendant is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the learned first Appellate Court, whereby the suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 12.7.2000, in respect of the land measuring 3 marlas, was decreed.

2. The plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of the aforesaid agreement on 15.6.2001, on the ground that out of the total sale consideration of Rs.42,000/-, a sum of Rs.38,900/- was paid as earnest money. The sale deed was to be registered on 11.1.2001 and that the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract, but the defendant did not get the sale deed executed. The plaintiff was present in the Tehsil Office, but the defendant did not appear. After serving a notice to the defendant calling upon him to get the sale deed registered on 1.6.2001, the plaintiff filed the present suit for specific performance.

3. The learned trial Court, returned a finding that the agreement of sale is proved to be executed as well as the fact that the earnest money of Rs.38,900/- was paid by the plaintiff. However, the relief of specific performance of the agreement was declined for the rea
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top