SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1468

PERMOD KOHLI
Ravi Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sanjiv Kumar Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Harjinder Singh, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. S.S. Behl, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Permod Kohli, J.:-Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, validity of the order dated 15.3.2007, Annexure P-4, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurgaon, has been questioned, by the petitioner-defendant. In a suit filed by the plaintiffs Sanjiv Kumar Jain and Smt.Amita Jain, claiming specific performance of sale agreement dated 4.12.2005, the petitioner-defendant Ravi Sharma filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint, inter-alia, on the following grounds:­

(i) That the plaint did not disclose cause of action in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants.

(ii) The alleged agreement, the basis of the suit, has been obtained by fraud and mis­ representation and the same is malafide.

2. This application was resisted by the plaintiff-respondents, who preferred objections to the same pleading therein that the plaint discloses cause of action, the agreement is enforceable in law, the allegations that the agreement has been procured by fraud and mis-representation, are also denied.

3. The learned trial Court vide its detailed order dated 15.3.2007, Ann


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top