PERMOD KOHLI
Ravi Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sanjiv Kumar Jain – Respondent
Permod Kohli, J.:-Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, validity of the order dated 15.3.2007, Annexure P-4, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurgaon, has been questioned, by the petitioner-defendant. In a suit filed by the plaintiffs Sanjiv Kumar Jain and Smt.Amita Jain, claiming specific performance of sale agreement dated 4.12.2005, the petitioner-defendant Ravi Sharma filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint, inter-alia, on the following grounds:
(i) That the plaint did not disclose cause of action in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants.
(ii) The alleged agreement, the basis of the suit, has been obtained by fraud and mis representation and the same is malafide.
2. This application was resisted by the plaintiff-respondents, who preferred objections to the same pleading therein that the plaint discloses cause of action, the agreement is enforceable in law, the allegations that the agreement has been procured by fraud and mis-representation, are also denied.
3. The learned trial Court vide its detailed order dated 15.3.2007, Ann
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.