M.M.KUMAR, JORA SINGH
Ajay Singh Mann – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
M.M. Kumar, J.:- The instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for quashing order dated 22.3.2006 (P-12) passed by the Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited (HSIDC)-respondent No. 3, resuming Industrial Plot No. 30, Phase 3, G.C. Bawal. A further prayer for quashing order dated 13.2.2007 C.W.P. No. 12981 of 2007 (P-13) has been made whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the resumption order has been rejected. Still further it has been prayed that direction be issued to the respondents to restore the aforementioned industrial plot in favour of the petitioner and also to issue letter of intent for implementation of the industrial project.
2. Brief facts of the case are that in pursuance to the application dated 27.5.1999 (P-1) made by the petitioner, industrial Plot No. 30, Phase 3, G.C. Bawal, measuring 250 Sq. Mtrs. was allotted vide Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 9.9.1999 (P-4). As per clause 4(i) of the Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 9.9.1999, Regular Letter of Allotment (RLA) was to be issued after fulfilling following formalities within a period of six months from the issue of LOI:-
? Obtain provisional registrati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.