SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1912

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Baldev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Mr. Gurnam Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.:- By this common judgment, I shall be disposing of two appeals both filed by Baldev Singh and Ajit Singh arising out of Civil Suit No.RBT 305 of 1998 titled as Baldev Singh and another Vs. Om Parkash and others in which they have sought declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction and Civil Suit No.RBT 252 of 1998 titled as Om Parkash and others Vs. Baldev Singh and another in which possession has been sought with mesne profits.

2. In order to understand the dispute in the present case, it is necessary that the pedigree table be reproduced, which is as under:-

Jiwan Singh

|

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | |

Kartar Singh Fauji Singh Piara Singh

(died issueless) (deceased) (now dead)

| | |

_________________ ________________ _________

| | | | |

Gurbax Malook Guirdeep Kapoor



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top