S.D.Anand, J.:-The petitioner is in revision against the order dated 6.10.2007 vide which the learned Trial Judge set aside the exparte decree dated 7.6.2006.

2. The circumstances, relevant for disposal of the controversy may be indicated hereunder in the first instance:-

The petitioner-husband Manjeet Singh filed a plea under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) to obtain dissolution of his marriage with respondent-wife who (respondent wife) entered appearance (through her learned counsel), for the first time, on 28.1.2005 and the matter was adjourned to 17.2.2005 for the presence of the parties in the context of making of reconciliation endeavour. On the adjourned date, the petitioner-husband appeared but the wife did not appear. Her brother turned up and informed the Court that she was unwell. The matter was adjourned to 3.3.2005. On that date too, the respondent wife was not present and the matter was adjourned to 28.3.2005 for production of the parties. On that date, the parties are not noticed to have appeared to have appeared. However, a duly engaged counsel appeared on behalf of the wife and the matter was adjourned to 11.4.200